000			02118nab a2200241 a 4500
005			20210219163304.0
008			991125s1985 mx 000 0 spa u
035			_aUPN01000219968
049			_aART
100	1		_aPonce de León, Aura
100	1		_uaura.cefpsvlt@gmail.com
222		0	_aLUDUS VITILIS : REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA DE LAS CIENCIAS DE LA VIDA
245	0	0	_aRasgos de la interpretación arqueológica : _bla hipótesis sobre compartir alimentos en el paleolítico
260			_aMéxico
300			_a199-210
362	0		_a2016 Volumen 23, número 45
520	3		_aArchaeological interpretation traitsAn example of an archaeological interpretation of certain traces of hominid intervention over the environment is examined in order to show some aspects of its disciplinary reasoning: its hypothetical nature, its choice of certain types of evidence and certain models to interpret them. The example under consideration is the classic interpretation of Glynn Isaac about food sharing behavior, inferred from the particular spatial and qualitative configuration of a group of archaeological remains. It is stated that each interpretative choice that is made discards not only unacceptable alternatives, but also other possible and acceptable ones within the viewpoint with which they are made. It is proposed that the biases that lead to choose one over the others come from various sources: inclinations and beliefs of who investigates, their certainties on the bodies of information that are appropriate to interpret, the prevailing academic environment, the focuses of attention, among others. Emphasis on searching and evaluation of consistency and coherence in models and analogies is made. Finally, it is proposed that by accepting the fragmentary, approximate and hypothetical nature of archaeological explanation, it can be clearly seen how plausible, fruitful, interesting and informative it is
653	0		_aINTERPRETACION ARQUEOLOGICA
653	0		_aPALEOLITICO
653	0		_aCONDUCTA AL COMPARTIR ALIMENTOS
856	4		_uhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/437958
905			_aArticulo
999			_c192067 _d192067